Here’s your Web Archiving Roundup for January 22, 2018:
- A Case for Digital Squirrels: in First Monday, authors Lindsay Kistler Mattock, Colleen Theisen, and Jennifer Burek Pierce look at ‘the myth of YouTube as an archive’ and discuss their ‘recommendations for developing new practices for archiving YouTube content to support scholarly research.’ (Archived link.)
- An update from Cobweb: from the University of California Los Angeles, Harvard University, and California Digital Library — and, with a production launch in 2018 — Cobweb seeks to empower ‘specialists, digital curators, and researchers’ by allowing them to ‘establish thematic web archiving collecting projects; nominate web resources for capture; claim nominated web resources with an intention to capture them; and contribute descriptions of those web resources that have been captured.’ (Archived link.)
- Rhizome receives $1 million from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation: the money ‘will support Webrecorder’s implementation in institutional contexts, while upgrading capture and usability for all users.’ (Archived link.)
- We’re all Bona Fide: on On Archivy, Bergis Jules argues that preserving cultural heritage on the web should be an inclusive and community-centered effort. ‘Archiving social media content,’ he writes, ‘should be a shared professional and community responsibility because it not only stretches our resources further, but it can also help to ensure that the records we end up creating are more representative of marginalized people.’ (Archived link.)
- You still have time to let the International Internet Preservation Consortium know what you need when it comes to web archiving training: fill out this survey, and help the Consortium in its quest to develop materials for all types of training, be it technical, curatorial, or training for practitioners and researchers.